Commonly confused
Velocity vs Throughput
Velocity counts story points completed per sprint — it's estimate-based and only meaningful within a single team. Throughput counts how many work items finish per period — a plain count that's harder to game and comparable across teams. Velocity answers 'how much estimated effort did we burn'; throughput answers 'how many things did we actually finish.'
Velocity vs Throughput, in short
- Velocity counts story points completed per sprint — it's estimate-based and only meaningful within a single team. Throughput counts how many work items finish per period — a plain count that's harder to game and comparable across teams. Velocity answers 'how much estimated effort did we burn'; throughput answers 'how many things did we actually finish.'
- When to use velocity: Use velocity for a team's own sprint-to-sprint capacity planning, knowing it's relative to that team's estimates.
- When to use throughput: Use throughput for a stable, estimate-free measure of delivery you can trend and compare.
| Aspect | Velocity | Throughput |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Velocity is the average amount of work a team completes per cycle, measured in issues or story points. By tracking it over several cycles, teams forecast how much they can realistically take on next. Velocity is a planning aid for a specific team over time — never a target to maximize or a way to compare teams against each other. | Throughput is the number of work items a team completes in a given period — issues finished per week, for example. It is the simplest flow metric: a direct count of output over time. Tracked across periods, throughput reveals a team's real delivery capacity and is the basis for probabilistic, estimate-free forecasting. |
| When to use it | Use velocity for a team's own sprint-to-sprint capacity planning, knowing it's relative to that team's estimates. | Use throughput for a stable, estimate-free measure of delivery you can trend and compare. |
| Full definition | Velocity | Throughput |